Assignments
Assignments, grounded in
your curriculum.
From setting and marking on the lecturer side to guided, ethical planning on the student side, assignments live on the same learning layer as everything else.
Assignments
From setting and marking on the lecturer side to guided, ethical planning on the student side, assignments live on the same learning layer as everything else.
Fully integrated with your LMS
Connect Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard once and the assignment and its submissions flow straight into Modality, the original PDFs and Word documents, with each student’s status and identity from the enrolment roster.
No downloading files one by one or hopping between systems. Everything you need to give students timely, formative feedback lands in one place.
Marking assistance
You define the rubric and referencing style in Modality, grounded in the module’s learning outcomes. That rubric is the format of the output: Modality marks each submission section by section against it, with a grade and a short summary per section.
Every callout is backed by a direct quote from the student’s work, so the feedback is specific and defensible, not a vague score. It is formative and fully editable, a first pass you review, adjust, and approve before anything reaches a student.
Grading guidelines
Harvard referencing| Criterion | AExcellent | BGood | CSatisfactory | DNeeds work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathophysiology30% | Mechanism linked to clinical signs | Mostly accurate | Basic | Vague or incorrect |
| Management plan40% | GDMT, correctly sequenced | Sound, minor gaps | Partial | Unsafe or missing |
| Evidence & referencing30% | Credible, well cited | Mostly supported | Some support | Unsupported |
Set in Modality, grounded in the module’s learning outcomes.
Formative feedback
OverallB+A well-structured response with strong physiological reasoning. The management plan is sound but would benefit from clearer sequencing, and two claims need supporting evidence.
Reference checking
Modality extracts every citation from a submission and searches academic databases, CrossRef, PubMed, and OpenAlex, to confirm each one actually exists.
It scores each reference for credibility, rates how well it matches your referencing style, and flags anything it cannot find as possibly fabricated, the kind of hallucinated citation that is easy to miss by eye. It is guidance for your judgement, with the source links to check for yourself.